matt, can you send the links / benchmarks you are seeing comparing j2ee performance to cf5?
you can send them to me directly if you like. just doing a quick search on google i came up with: http://web.oreilly.com/news/coldfusion2_0901.html "Additionally, it allows ColdFusion to leverage the strengths of the J2EE platform--mainly the performance boost you get from using compiled byte code..." now, this is not the final word of course, but i think that it demonstrates the issue is not as clear cut as you make it out to be. the only CF / JSP / Java comparisons i could find (with a quick search) used CF 4.5. also, keep in mind that we are talking about a new version of a j2ee server (jrun) which could be significantly faster than past editions. Finally, since a lot of the final development is focused on performance tuning, it really is too early to determine where CFMX with fall performance wise. thanks... mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:36 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > I wasn't suggesting benchmarking it; that will come in time. I am just > pointing out that J2EE can't keep up with CF 5, so CFMX won't > be able to > either. > > -Matt > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
