Ben Johnson wrote: > > I'm not 100% about this, but the Flash Remoting uses a binary protocol > called AMF for the remoting so it would be probably be pretty rough > duplicating it in CF5.
What sort of performance can we expect from this protocol? We all know that the URLEncoded strings that can be used to communicate with Flash are pretty bulky. (Can HTTP compression be used with Flash?) But does this binary protocol offer any compression or does it inflate similar to encoding mechanismss? Suppose I am transfering a 30 row recordset with 5 fields with an INT4 in each field. What mechanism would be best to transfer this resultset to Flash in terms of bandwidth used? Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
