> What sort of performance can we expect from this protocol? We > all know that the URLEncoded strings that can be used to > communicate with Flash are pretty bulky. (Can HTTP compression > be used with Flash?) But does this binary protocol offer > any compression or does it inflate similar to encoding > mechanismss?
It appears to be quite a bit smaller than a comparable SOAP response, which makes sense. > Suppose I am transfering a 30 row recordset with 5 fields > with an INT4 in each field. What mechanism would be best to > transfer this resultset to Flash in terms of bandwidth used? AMF, I think. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
