Good Grief! *brews more coffee* mySQL mySQL mySQL... For some stupid reason, I read it as "Access vs MS SQL". :/ By all means use mySQL over Access... every day of the week and twice on Sunday. :)
-----Original Message----- From: Hoag, Claudia (LNG) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: FW: mySQL vs. Access I mean mySQL! *looking for coffee cup* -----Original Message----- From: Hoag, Claudia (LNG) Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: mySQL vs. Access Hm, if we're talking SMALL small then I would think you don't have to pay anything to use msSQL, right? -----Original Message----- From: Carlisle, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: mySQL vs. Access If we're talking SMALL small and software licencing is a concern, then Access will do the job as well. msSQL is preferable if budget permits, but Access is an ok substitute if there are fewer requests, smaller tables, etc... Eric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:24 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: mySQL vs. Access My opinion is to use MySQL as it is much faster and more robust than Access. I use MySQL for all my small stuff. HTH -- Clint Tredway ---------------------------------- Through Him, anything is possible. > Which database would be better to use for a small Intranet with a few > updatable pages, mySQL or Access? > Any experiences using one over another? What about ease of use? > > Thanks, > Dave > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
