There's something about this community and it's strange attitude toward CFLOCK that has always "gotten my goat." It would be nice to be able to question CF-Talk doctrine without having anyone's competence made an issue.
Although I would like to apologize, I can't help pointing out that your own message is as nasty as any of the others. It's catchy, isn't it? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cravens, Billy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:58 PM Subject: RE: RE: Application Slow Down was RE: Absolutely necessary to cflock session variables > This is just keeps getting sadder and sadder. Why do people always feel > they have to wage these wars in front of the list, when a post > one-on-one off-list post would suffice? I suppose integrity, > professionalism, and respect of the community aren't that important. > > --- > Billy Cravens > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
