Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then though mx does alot of neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe someday someone can make J2EE run a little faster lol.
Bill Wheatley Senior Database Developer Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer EDIETS.COM 954.360.9022 X159 ICQ 417645 ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > *sniff sniff* ahh, the good old CF3 days, back when there were a > zillion restrictions on cfoutput.... Pound signs everywhere.... > cfloops that counted slower than you saying the numbers.... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:14 am > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > Dave Watts wrote: > > >>Why can I not just reference my queries at > > >>application.[queryName].[value] throughout my > > >>application? > > > > > > > > > You can. This is actually described near the bottom of the > > technote.I'm not > > > sure why the writer bothered with all that copying queries to > > arrays > > stuff > > > at the top. > > > > and the coding style is bad way to many #'s where they aren't need and > > they don't lock! but it's cf 3.0 code :-) > > > > z > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
