This really is a problem with upgrading to MX. I would hate to re-write and entire application just because MX does not seem to play well with CF5 code. I have seen so many posts regarding problems people are having with MX and am wondering if I should just wait until a SP comes out for it. What are everone elses thoughts?
Douglas Brown Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:44 AM Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > It really depends on how your application is put together. If you > followed some of the standard ways CF applications were put together, > then CFMX will smoke CF 5. However, if you had taken the time to write > applications that were designed to smoke every other application server > on the market with CF 5, you are pretty much screwed with CFMX. > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > V: 415-577-8070 > F: 415-341-8906 > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > Really? Our CFMX smokes any of our CF5 installs! You sure you don't > have > > debug on? ;-) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then though mx does > alot > > of > > neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe someday someone can make J2EE run a > little > > faster lol. > > > > Bill Wheatley > > Senior Database Developer > > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > EDIETS.COM > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > ICQ 417645 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:21 AM > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > *sniff sniff* ahh, the good old CF3 days, back when there were a > > > zillion restrictions on cfoutput.... Pound signs everywhere.... > > > cfloops that counted slower than you saying the numbers.... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:14 am > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > Dave Watts wrote: > > > > >>Why can I not just reference my queries at > > > > >>application.[queryName].[value] throughout my > > > > >>application? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can. This is actually described near the bottom of the > > > > technote.I'm not > > > > > sure why the writer bothered with all that copying queries to > > > > arrays > > > > stuff > > > > > at the top. > > > > > > > > and the coding style is bad way to many #'s where they aren't need > and > > > > they don't lock! but it's cf 3.0 code :-) > > > > > > > > z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
