:) oh and I do like CFMX in case you might get the idea I don't lol Bill Wheatley Senior Database Developer Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer EDIETS.COM 954.360.9022 X159 ICQ 417645 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Forta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope
> Douglas, > > Well, if you are planning to wait for an SP you could end up waiting for > a long long time, there is no SP scheduled at this time. > > And while there have been posts here about problems upgrading, realize > that there are a couple of thousand subscribers to this list (and far > less than that are regular contributors) and that is a very small > percentage of the CF user base - the reality is that most users have not > experienced upgrade problems at all. With the exception of COM (which is > being looked at) and the documented changes (e.g. advanced security, > dynamic database connections) this has actually been a very painless > upgrade for most (far less painful than say CF3.x to CF4 or CF4 to > CF4.5). > > Hope this helps. > > --- Ben > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:54 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > This really is a problem with upgrading to MX. I would hate to re-write > and entire application just because MX does not seem to play well with > CF5 code. I have seen so many posts regarding problems people are having > with MX and am wondering if I should just wait until a SP comes out for > it. What are everone elses thoughts? > > > > > Douglas Brown > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:44 AM > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > It really depends on how your application is put together. If you > > followed some of the standard ways CF applications were put together, > > then CFMX will smoke CF 5. However, if you had taken the time to write > > > applications that were designed to smoke every other application > > server on the market with CF 5, you are pretty much screwed with CFMX. > > > > Matt Liotta > > President & CEO > > Montara Software, Inc. > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > V: 415-577-8070 > > F: 415-341-8906 > > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:42 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > Really? Our CFMX smokes any of our CF5 installs! You sure you don't > > have > > > debug on? ;-) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then though mx does > > alot > > > of > > > neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe someday someone can make J2EE run a > > little > > > faster lol. > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > > Senior Database Developer > > > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer EDIETS.COM > > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > ICQ 417645 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:21 AM > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > > > > *sniff sniff* ahh, the good old CF3 days, back when there were a > > > > zillion restrictions on cfoutput.... Pound signs everywhere.... > > > > cfloops that counted slower than you saying the numbers.... > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:14 am > > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > > > Dave Watts wrote: > > > > > >>Why can I not just reference my queries at > > > > > >>application.[queryName].[value] throughout my > > > > > >>application? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can. This is actually described near the bottom of the > > > > > technote.I'm not > > > > > > sure why the writer bothered with all that copying queries to > > > > > arrays > > > > > stuff > > > > > > at the top. > > > > > > > > > > and the coding style is bad way to many #'s where they aren't > need > > and > > > > > they don't lock! but it's cf 3.0 code :-) > > > > > > > > > > z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
