I have used Fusebox for about six months on two small sites. I like it
enough that I adopted it as our standard methodology for all future
development. However, I have not explored any of the Extended Fusebox
methods that are part of the upcoming FB 3.0 specification. I'm willing to
use any methodology that accomplishes the same degree of "black box"
severability, as I consider that to be a key piece of collaborative
projects.
I've been a professional developer since 1997, most of that in ColdFusion
and Microsoft SQL Server. I consider myself to be at an advanced skill
level with those technologies. I also know Perl (advanced), C++
(intermediate), and Visual Basic (beginner). I work for a Fortune 10
company, but don't let that fool you: my department is really, really tiny.
I'm the senior programmer and I have one person who works for me as a
junior programmer. For about a year, I was the only programmer. So, I
have a lot of experience in all phases of the SDLC, but my strengths are
NOT with project management. I'm willing to help wherever I'm needed, but
I'd prefer to stick with code, requirements, specifications, and design. I
do great dB design (if I do say so myself) but I suck at graphics stuff. I
don't know Photoshop from my *(%#.
|------------------------------------+------------------------------------|
|Eric A. Laney |"Time wounds all heels." |
|Systems Engineer | |
|LAN Optimization Team | |
|Voice: 813.978.4404 | - Jane Ace|
|Pager: 888.985.8519 | |
|------------------------------------+------------------------------------|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
