Fusebox itself offers very little other than consistency. The problem
with Fusebox and almost every other CF methodology is that it relies on
custom tags which don't scale.
-Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Brownlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:33 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: Next step
Hey, just my opinion my man. No war intended.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:28 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: Next step
> - If you insist on using Fusebox, good luck and I'll work with you. I
> strongly suggest that you don't. Fusebox is fine for web site
> development. This isn't a web site. It's an application.
That's funny. Not trying to start another war, but I've often said
exactly the opposite about fusebox. It's good for applications, but not
ordinary web sites. :)
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
