This is a pretty handy testing tool http://www.browsercam.com/
They have a variety of OS/browsers setup which you can access via remote desktop.
Cheers,
Pete
On 4/19/06, Tom Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:00:33PM +1000, Dale Fraser wrote:
>
> Here's an idea.
>
> Don't support safari.
>
> Catering to such a small minority is a waste of time. Get the mac users to
> use a different browser.
>
> Regards
> Dale Fraser
Do remember that your site's statistics may reflect its current
behaviour instead of your potential audience. On the other hand, if the
Safari support is really only to satisfy the quirks of manager X who
happens to be a fanatic, maybe the client should know what that support
is costing them. Might change their minds on how important it is.
For _javascript_ issues, I *prefer* to test my code on as many platforms
as possible, if only to help identify areas that are not as robust as
they could be.
IEmac is another issue entirely...
</$0.02>
-T
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows Tom Kerr
- [cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows Peter Galipo
