Woot! converting tag based syntax into cfscript makes the code run faster? I've never heard that one before...
On 5/11/06, Joel Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For some things it seems a lot faster, especially when there's a lot of > processing involved of structs and arrays etc. But not everything I guess.. > Usually the code starts off in tags and if I see that it's running a bit > slow I change it to cfscript.. Sometimes it runs a bit faster.. I cannot > give you hard examples though. Maybe it's because I turn the tags into > functions in the process.. who knows. I am a bit old school. I still take > pleasure in the joys of using cold fusion studio 4.5 every now and then. > > > Joel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of M@ Bourke > Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2006 7:46 PM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Whats so bad about the tag syntax? > > >I only use cfscript to improve the speed of things > > How so? > you mean writing it?? > as cfml hasn't been any slower then cfscript since mx came out. > back in the olden days cfscript was faster but these days its all compiled > to the same old byte code > > M@ > > > > > > -- Mark Stanton Gruden Pty Ltd http://www.gruden.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---