Interesting.. I agree (now).. Have actually tested it and found no
real difference. That's great. I guess it was a remainder from the 'olden
days'. Perhaps it's the review and restructuring of code when moving it over to
cfscript that makes it faster. I take that comment back. But it wasn't slower
either, so what you say is true..
Joel
-----Original Message----->I only use cfscript to improve the speed of things
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of M@ Bourke
Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2006 7:46 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Whats so bad about the tag syntax?
How so?
you mean writing it??
as cfml hasn't been any slower then cfscript since mx came out.
back in the olden days cfscript was faster but these days its all compiled to the same old byte code
M@
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
