That's what I was afraid of, so if this.teststring = 'test'; would not be returned in the object is what your saying? Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 8676 4223 Mobile: 0404 998 273
-----Original Message----- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:02 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question Andrew, CFC's are not serialisable, so all you get back is a WDDX packet that describes the CFC, not its current state. Mark On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark, > > Thanks but the code I use also allows for wddx, so if it was to return this, > it would be serialised as a wddx packet and reserialised at the other end > anyway. jsmx is great in this way. > > I am also aware of the differences in cfc's as not being normal java > objects, but I did rewrite my own java version of cfquery once before which > worked well as an object of type Map, which is why I was thinking out aloud > here. -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
