just to be clear here - four points: Adobe CF (and BD for that matter) is a commercial product, not opensource.
the CF marketshare is too small/fragile to leave support of the platform (tools) to outside sources... for a commercial product (why do I care? if the tools are inadequate, no one will want to use it) Adobe (and Macromedia before) make IDE's for a living. However (AFAIK) only New Atlanta have given any support to Mark Drew and Rob Rohan for CFEclipse. IMHO, the comparison of ASP.NET IDE's and CF's is more valid than with PHP or Ruby. They both create a revenue stream for the parent company, ensuring (hopefully) it's longevity. or is the CF community comfortable with this situation? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
