Geoff,

I am aware what il8n is, I am also aware as to when the standard was
introduced. Software applications have been using localisation even back in
the days of Windows 2.0, and regardless of that fact. I just believe that
instead of creating all these extra LS functions, that ended up being
wrappers they could have introduced the localisation into the existing tags.
That's not just my view, Allaire didn't choose that way, and I am curious as
to the real reason. Was it to slowly deprecate the older functions, or was
there another reason behind that decision?



Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613  9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273


-----Original Message-----
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Geoff Bowers
Sent: Monday, 14 January 2008 9:29 AM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: should DateFormat() be depricated (in favour
ofLSDateFormat())?


On Jan 13, 9:41 pm, "Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nobody was talking about i18n, you were the first to bring it up.
>
> As far as the 2 functions they do exactly the same thing, the only
> difference one works in other countries outside of the USA and the
> other doesn't.

i18n is the umbrella topic for anything to do with regional
adaptation, including date formatting.

Much as I am loathe to quote Wikipedia:
"Internationalization is the process of designing a software
application so that it can be adapted to various languages and regions
without engineering changes. Localization is the process of adapting
software for a specific region or language by adding locale-specific
components and translating text."

The process of engineering a solution that is "internationalised" such
that you can readily localise the interface is no mean feat.  It
doesn't simply involve masking dates -- it is a hugely complex task
that is even more difficult to retrofit into an existing system.

All this is beside the point -- it's your assertion that by
deciphering the approach used in the code from cf8 you have an insight
into design decisions made pre-cf5 that I'm refuting. Not to mention
that your inane, derogatory quips about developers, about whom you
know nothing, have no place in this forum.

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to