One thing I'm curious about - is the "bloat" at least relative? Ie, does it simply add the same amount of time to all reports? If so, it would still be useful to say that CFCA.MethodA() is X times slower than CFCB.MethodB().
=========================================================================== Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com) Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia) Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean A Corfield > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [CFCDev] CFCs and Debugging > > On Mar 1, 2004, at 12:21 PM, Brian Kotek wrote: > > This is CORRECT by the way! It really is "report execution times" > > that kills the execution time! Thanks David. > > If you choose summary rather than tree, you can still get > reasonable performance *and* execution times. > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
