RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns

[Brian Kotek]

I’ve never heard of any security concerns related to implicit invocation. And I don’t know how you can reply to such an open and unsubstantiated question. I’d ask him to provide more detail.   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Ferraro Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:02 PM To: cfcdev@cfczone.org Subject: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns   A client of mine said that he was concerned with Mach-ii because he was worried about implicit invocation security concerns. I've searched around but I haven't been able to get much information about implicit invocation and security and nothing about Mach-ii security concerns. How do I reply to his query in a way that will make him confident in the framework?