webdrive! thanks for whoever submitted that. Works better than file explorer (couldn't create a file) and solves my flex builder on linux problem as well. Worth the $60
Jim --- Sammy Larbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My assumption was that dev server meant repository. Like, you might > have > local machine for actual development/testing, then "dev server" for > the > code repository, then production server, and so on. > > I wouldn't check in code before I had tested it, so I agree with you. > > > I probably just scanned it and put in too many assumptions. My > apologies for that. > > In any case, my assumptions and misunderstandings led to a blog post > where I've gotten a few good comments. The post is essentially > worthless, except to pose the questions, but the comments have been > useful to me (so, you can scroll down to them, or answer the question > as > well, if you wanted). > http://www.codeodor.com/index.cfm/2007/2/7/How-do-you-version-control-your-CF/930 > > > > > RADEMAKERS Tanguy wrote, On 2/7/2007 2:08 PM: > > I'm not being picky about "dev" vs. "test". My point was about the > use > > of svn to "... update the working copy on your dev server each time > you > > check in some code." > > > > You shouldn't have to check in code to see your changes, you should > just > > be able to save your file and then reload your browser (whilst java > > developers around you gasp in amazement). Once it's all working > (well, > > once there are no more really obvious bugs), THEN you check it > in... > > > > Or am i still misunderstanding? > > > > /t > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > >> Of Sammy Larbi > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:56 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [CFCDEV] RE: DW vs Eclipse > >> > >> RADEMAKERS Tanguy wrote, On 2/7/2007 1:05 PM: > >> > >>> I would have assumed that you use your dev server to test your > >>> code...no? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I just also assumed i "knew what was meant" and didn't focus > >> too much on > >> the exact terminology, but rather the intent of the statement. > >> Again, I > >> may very well be assuming too much, since that's two > >> assumptions on the > >> same sentence =) > >> > >> > >> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > >>>> Of Sammy Larbi > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:05 PM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: [CFCDEV] RE: DW vs Eclipse > >>>> > >>>> RADEMAKERS Tanguy wrote, On 2/7/2007 12:41 PM: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> the downside to this approach is that you have to check in a > change > >>>>> before being able to see it on your dev server. Plus this > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> means you will > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> have lots of non-working checkins in svn. > >>>>> > >>>>> /t > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> I would have assumed that you'd be testing before checking in > >>>> the code. > >>>> But, I may have been assuming wrong. > >>>> > > > > > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the > instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm > > > > CFCDev is supported by: > > Katapult Media, Inc. > > We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! > > www.katapultmedia.com > > > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the > instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm > > CFCDev is supported by: > Katapult Media, Inc. > We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! > www.katapultmedia.com > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
