Jaime,

Not sure where you get that idea from, but most complex objects
translate across seamlessly, and any ones that don't are able to be
used inline in CF without any extra effort.

Where did you get the idea that this stuff needed a facade?

Mark

On 4/15/07, Jaime Metcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kolya,

I'm really speaking from ignorance here.  I had the impression that complex
data types did not interoperate seamlessly across the Java/CF boundary e.g.
you need to convert Java ResultSets to CF QueryTables; Java functions that
return an array don't actually return CF arrays.  These are minor things but
not what I'd called "seamless", and if I need to wrap my Java domain model
in a facade to do these conversions that could tip the cost/benefit balance.

A big part of the equation is this: we're currently a two-programmer, one
language shop.  If we're going to add a second language, what's going to pay
for itself sooner - Java or ActionScript?  OTOH, for some applications Java
+ Flex might make more sense than Java + CF + Flex, especially if the latter
looks like Java + JavaCFFacade + CF + CFFlexFacade + Flex.

Jaime Metcher

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kola
> Oyedeji
> Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 10:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CFCDEV] Class methods part III - is there problem?
>
>
> I think option 2 is definitely an option to be considered. Perhaps not
> even for technical reasons but more for organisational reasons based
> on experience of teams, making use of existing infrastructure, APIs
> etc.  as I alluded to here:
>
> http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2007/02/27/coldfusion-for-jsp-de
> velopers.html
>
> As for 3 - I was a bit disappointed that the CFCProxy was a) an
> Enterprise only feature and b) was tied to the current class loader
> (although I can sort of understand the reasons for this). That said -
> I have yet to come across a situation where I have wanted/needed any
> tighter integration with ColdFusion.
>
> What better integration were you thinking of?
>
> ~Kola
>
> www.coolskool.blog-city.com
> www.cfframeworks.com
>
>
> You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the
> instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm
>
> CFCDev is supported by:
> Katapult Media, Inc.
> We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock!
> www.katapultmedia.com
>
> An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]





You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at 
http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm

CFCDev is supported by:
Katapult Media, Inc.
We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock!
www.katapultmedia.com

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]




--
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.compoundtheory.com


You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at 
http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm

CFCDev is supported by:
Katapult Media, Inc.
We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock!
www.katapultmedia.com

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

Reply via email to