On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh I agree. I'm sorry, I should have mentioned that this is a short- > term hack. I really think the right answer is to bite the size cost > and bump tokens up to being 12 bytes instead of 11. This would allow > us to read a token by doing 3 4-byte loads, and wouldn't require > target-specific hacks.
Does this have to be tied to the size of Token; the data & size in the PTH file shouldn't need to be tied to the Token structure? - Daniel _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
