On Jan 18, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Oh I agree. I'm sorry, I should have mentioned that this is a short- >> term hack. I really think the right answer is to bite the size cost >> and bump tokens up to being 12 bytes instead of 11. This would allow >> us to read a token by doing 3 4-byte loads, and wouldn't require >> target-specific hacks. > > Does this have to be tied to the size of Token; the data & size in the > PTH file shouldn't need to be tied to the Token structure?
The encoding in the PTH file has nothing to do with the Token struct. -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
