with the assert added back, LGTM.

I'll think about how to make the asserts tighter, and we can come back & fix up 
the test case if there ends up being a better way to do that.

================
Comment at: src/Unwind/Unwind-EHABI.cpp:174
@@ +173,3 @@
+  size_t off = 0;
+  unwindingData = decode_eht_entry(unwindingData, &off, &len);
+  if (unwindingData == nullptr) {
----------------
assert((*unwindingData & 0xf0000000) == 0x80000000 && "Must be a compact 
entry");

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5112



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to