In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8484#145724, @joerg wrote:
> Well, in this case I would prefer to black list systems that want to ignore > the option. I think that's a far better approach. A black list that excluded PS4 or a white list that didn't include PS4 would be equally fine. Emitting the "not supported for this target" diagnostic would be gravy. > While I don't agree with the reasoning of the PS4 guys, I can understood the > pain. But it should be applied to other systems as it violates POLA. Not clear what "it" you are referring to here. But a diagnostic that says "program not executable" seems more astonishing than either of the alternatives. http://reviews.llvm.org/D8484 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
