Does gcc intend to fix this soon? Isn't being compatible with gcc important than the other things?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Sean Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > Please add a lengthy comment describing exactly how to reproduce the case > where GCC's output is "broken" and our deviation from its behavior results > in things not being broken. Also, in the test file, please isolate all > testing of this behavioral deviation and identify it as such. Other than > that, this LGTM. > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D9208 > > EMAIL PREFERENCES > http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
