On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, James Y Knight <jykni...@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sean Silva <chisophu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> What documentation updates do you mean? >>> >> >> Additions/modifications to: >> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#inline-assembler-expressions >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_docs_LangRef.html-23inline-2Dassembler-2Dexpressions&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=BSqEv9KvKMW_Ob8SyngJ70KdZISM_ASROnREeq0cCxk&m=u3CcqjIoERsKpg0HB4Ds_N01tFBBS1kr4WNYmjXPUvk&s=flz5OqWJ4huQR1l9sE-2f2WvTSOfXZGErmrwEH9PT5E&e=> >> > > That is only documenting LLVM's support for constraints, and this is only > modifying clang's support. > Yeah, I guess I assumed that this would be going in with accompanying changes to the LLVM ones, so wanted to get it on the radar. -- Sean Silva > > There are (still) no docs on what constraints clang supports (it's often > the same as LLVM's support, but not always. It's really quite unfortunate > how much of the information about what the constraints mean is duplicated > in clang; it'd be nice to clean that up at some point...) > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits