None of the other warnings choke on this program. [-othercflags "-Weverything -Wno-infinite-recursion”]
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Richard Trieu <rtr...@google.com> wrote: > > A reduced test case wouldn't be that useful since stack overflows are > dependent on the system under test. Since you have access to the code, you > can rerun Clang with all the warnings on (with "-Weverything") and just > disable this warning (with "-Wno-infinite-recursion"). This will show if all > the other warnings can handle your large CFG. > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Vedant Kumar <v...@apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Richard Trieu <rtr...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Is the code that produces the large CFG available? It may be useful to > > test that other users of the CFG can cope with processing the code. > > Sadly no :(. > > Clang gave up after checking a little less than 25,000 CFGBlocks. > > Would you like me to try and reproduce this behavior with a simplified test > case? > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
