> On 2015-Jul-23, at 11:54, Vedant Kumar <v...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Two patches attached again: part1 no behavior change, part2 as before.
> 
>> Actually, this whole function looks like it's just checking for a
>> recursive path.  You could change it to return `bool`, and rename it
>> something like `hasRecursiveCall()`, and leave the state-related logic
>> out of the helper.  Maybe better in a follow-up patch?
> 
> I went ahead and took care of this in the first patch, since it cleans things 
> up nicely.
> 
>> I think this would be clearer like this:
>> 
>>   const CXXMemberCallExpr *MCE = dyn_cast<CXXMemberCallExpr>(CE);
>>   if (!MCE || isa<CXXThisExpr>(MCE->getImplicitObjectArgument()) ||
>>       !MCE->getMethodDecl()->isVirtual())
>>     return FoundPath;
> 
> Yup, done.
> 
>> In either case, this could be merged with the early exit:
>> 
>>   if (State == FoundPathWithNoRecursiveCall)
>>     if (ExitID == ID)
>>       return;
>>     if (hasRecusiveCallInPath(FD, Block)
>>       State = FoundPath;
>>   }
> 
> Done.
> 
> <checkForFunctionCall-part1.patch><checkForFunctionCall-part2.patch>

LGTM.  I committed for you in r243038 and r243039.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to