On May 3, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm adding Doug as this is changing the AST in a non-trivial way, and his > review is probably best there. > > Also, Bill, I'm CC-ing you because I'm worried this might be a release > blocker... The bug has been here for a long time, I'm not even sure if its a > regression, but we noticed this in the wild (not with contrived code), and > non-deterministic output seems really really bad. > > FYI, after chatting on IRC, Doug OK-ed this patch. > > He also didn't think it was likely a release blocker. If anyone disagrees or > cares greatly about the deterministic output of debug info in 3.1, give a > shout. >
While it would be great to have no bugs, I don't know if I can accept this as a release blocker if it's not a major regression from 3.0. I already tagged release candidate 2, so any changes now would disrupt the testers' lives... -bw
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
