On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 3, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Bill Wendling <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 3, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I'm adding Doug as this is changing the AST in a non-trivial way, and his >> review is probably best there. >> >> Also, Bill, I'm CC-ing you because I'm worried this might be a release >> blocker... The bug has been here for a long time, I'm not even sure if its >> a regression, but we noticed this in the wild (not with contrived code), >> and non-deterministic output seems really really bad. >> > > FYI, after chatting on IRC, Doug OK-ed this patch. > > He also didn't think it was likely a release blocker. If anyone disagrees > or cares greatly about the deterministic output of debug info in 3.1, give > a shout. > > > While it would be great to have no bugs, I don't know if I can accept this > as a release blocker if it's not a major regression from 3.0. I already > tagged release candidate 2, so any changes now would disrupt the testers' > lives... > > > I agree. This does not need to go into 3.1 > I also agree fwiw.... my comment here was only meant to try to let folks know about this. =]
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
