Could you guys work on the email output of this so that it's more 
person-friendly?

In particular, crap like this:
    djasper updated the revision "Hooks for custom CompilationDatabase".
1) does not need to be at the top of the message and
2) has all of its content implied by the email headers anyway.

It seems to me like a comment on a patch should come out as an unadorned
message, ideally with some quoted history.  A new patch, or a revision on a
patch, can have more introductory verbiage, although again it doesn't really
seem necessary;  just the patch description followed by the patch would be
great.

Also, I do not care about your username on the review system;  please take it
out of the From: header.

John.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to