On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:53 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, David Tweed <[email protected]> wrote: >> ping on patch review status: the original submission did have a couple of >> issues pointed out in review, primarily because it wasn't quite the patch I >> intended to send. With the explanation of the alternating choice of triples >> and the correct patch sent, is this suitable for committing in order to fix >> those test failures on ARM? > > I had half a mind to wait for John to OK the alternating choices of > triples, but honestly that minor detail seems fine for post-commit > feedback if he feels strongly about it.
I don't have any real problem with the alternating triples. John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
