On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:24 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:53 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, David Tweed <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ping on patch review status: the original submission did have a couple of >>> issues pointed out in review, primarily because it wasn't quite the patch I >>> intended to send. With the explanation of the alternating choice of triples >>> and the correct patch sent, is this suitable for committing in order to fix >>> those test failures on ARM? >> >> I had half a mind to wait for John to OK the alternating choices of >> triples, but honestly that minor detail seems fine for post-commit >> feedback if he feels strongly about it. > > I don't have any real problem with the alternating triples. > > John.
Committed as r163564. Thanks for looking into this David, let me know if there's anything else I (/we) can do to help get more those ARM bots to green. - David _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
