On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Nico Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: nico > Date: Sat Oct 20 01:18:14 2012 > New Revision: 166370 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=166370&view=rev > Log: > Accept -Wno-arc-abi without warning for a while. > > Xcode 4.5 passes -Wno-arc-abi to clang, which makes a clang newer than > r163917 warn that it doesn't understand -Wno-arc-abi. I asked if adding > this is ok at > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121015/066433.html > and nobody objected. > > Adding this makes life a bit easier for the chromium project. If you think > this is a burden on for clang, shout, and I'll revert this. This is OK. Please add a test case. - Fariborz > > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td > > Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td?rev=166370&r1=166369&r2=166370&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td Sat Oct 20 01:18:14 2012 > @@ -279,6 +279,8 @@ > def CustomAtomic : DiagGroup<"custom-atomic-properties">; > def AtomicProperties : DiagGroup<"atomic-properties", > [ImplicitAtomic, CustomAtomic]>; > +// FIXME: Remove arc-abi once an Xcode is released that doesn't pass this > flag. > +def : DiagGroup<"arc-abi">; > def ARCUnsafeRetainedAssign : DiagGroup<"arc-unsafe-retained-assign">; > def ARCRetainCycles : DiagGroup<"arc-retain-cycles">; > def ARCNonPodMemAccess : DiagGroup<"arc-non-pod-memaccess">; > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
