So everybody seems to be ok with the performance. Eric, do you have any opinion on the caching part?
thanks, Adrian On Feb 27, 2013, at 2:36 PM, jahanian <[email protected]> wrote: > LGTM. > - Thanks Fariborz > > On Feb 27, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:04 AM, jahanian <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> LLVM IR times look within reasonable range. Also, please make sure what you >>> are >>> timing has @implementation of classes in them and preferably, with bunch of >>> their >>> own private ivars. >>> >> >> >> Building an entire application (that uses the feature) with “time”: >> >> Baseline >> ======== >> Debug+Asserts: >> user 31m45.597s >> >> Release >> user 3m52.094s >> >> with patch >> ========== >> Debug+Asserts: >> user 31m35.599s >> Release >> user 3m52.637s >> >> >> -- adrian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
