A test for this would be great (the found decl is included in the output of -ast-dump, so you could test that).
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:2363-2364 @@ -2362,4 +2362,4 @@ if (!NeedsADL && R.isSingleResult() && !R.getAsSingle<FunctionTemplateDecl>()) - return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(), - R.getFoundDecl()); + return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(), R.getFoundDecl(), + R.getRepresentativeDecl()); ---------------- These arguments appear to be reversed from the declaration of BuildDeclarationNameExpr. Is that intentional? http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D550 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
