================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:2363-2364 @@ -2362,4 +2362,4 @@ if (!NeedsADL && R.isSingleResult() && !R.getAsSingle<FunctionTemplateDecl>()) - return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(), - R.getFoundDecl()); + return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(), R.getFoundDecl(), + R.getRepresentativeDecl()); ---------------- Richard Smith wrote: > These arguments appear to be reversed from the declaration of > BuildDeclarationNameExpr. Is that intentional? I hope I am getting this right. I think they just mean different things. The confusion is about FoundD(ecl).
In the context of a DeclRefExpr, it seems to mean the actually referenced Decl, i.e. the UsingShadowDecl if it references through it. In the context of a LookupResult, the getFoundDecl() returns the underlying decl and getRepresentativeDecl() returns what would be the DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl(). http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D550 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
