On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:37 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Do you mean something like this?
> >
> > Yes, with a few more (non-trivial) test vectors.
>
> Here's a version with some more interesting tests. I've also opted to
> treat __builtin_clz(0) as non-const as per Richard's suggestion.
Don't return false from VisitCallExpr without emitting a diagnostic (see
the comment at the top of the file) -- replace the
if (!Val)
return false;
with
if (!Val)
return Error(E);
Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
