On 12 June 2013 16:35, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason not to just build a single vector of unexpanded > packs, and check it once? >
Nope! Updated patch attached. Nick > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> wrote: > > This patch fixes a slight oversight with a pack expansion of constructor > > initialization lists of the form "S() : T<Pack1>(Pack2)... {}" not > checking > > the arity of the unexpanded packs in the initializer expression. > > > > Fixes PR16303. Please review! > > > > Nick > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > >
pr16303-2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
