Looks great, thanks!
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 June 2013 16:35, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is there a reason not to just build a single vector of unexpanded >> packs, and check it once? > > > Nope! Updated patch attached. > > Nick > >> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This patch fixes a slight oversight with a pack expansion of constructor >> > initialization lists of the form "S() : T<Pack1>(Pack2)... {}" not >> > checking >> > the arity of the unexpanded packs in the initializer expression. >> > >> > Fixes PR16303. Please review! >> > >> > Nick >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cfe-commits mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> > > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
