I believe we're ok here. All of your sizeof's are of compile-time sized arrays.
Howard On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hm, now I recall why I avoided using sizeof originally: > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3639.html > does not define sizeof for runtime-sized arrays (though clang and gcc > both allow that, even in strict c++ mode). > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:30:43PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:55:18AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:47:18PM -0400, Howard Hinnant wrote: >>>>> I'm having trouble applying this patch: >>>> >>>> Sorry, redone patch attached. Please try again. >>> >>> Please use sizeof() explicitly. >> >> Done. > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
