Okay, if you're happy with it, then I am too!
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe we're ok here. All of your sizeof's are of compile-time sized > arrays. > > Howard > > On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hm, now I recall why I avoided using sizeof originally: >> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3639.html >> does not define sizeof for runtime-sized arrays (though clang and gcc >> both allow that, even in strict c++ mode). >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:30:43PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:55:18AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:47:18PM -0400, Howard Hinnant wrote: >>>>>> I'm having trouble applying this patch: >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, redone patch attached. Please try again. >>>> >>>> Please use sizeof() explicitly. >>> >>> Done. >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
