On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: hhinnant > Date: Sat Sep 21 14:25:37 2013 > New Revision: 191142 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191142&view=rev > Log: > Apply LWG 2048. It is amazing to me that this actually works, but the > existing tests confirm that it does. c++1y status page now showing libc++ is > complete for c++1y modulo dynarray issues. > > This is fantastic! > > I'd love to see a blog post or something about having C++1y (library) > implemented during the CD period, and the benefits this provides to the > committee and standardization process. =D I've attempted to send such a post to [email protected]. It's been nearly an hour since I tried and I've yet to see it show up. I don't keep a regular blog. Perhaps someone here knows how to get the following posted on http://isocpp.org? Marshall Clow set up a detailed checklist for bringing libc++ up to spec with respect to C++1y ahead of the Chicago meeting: http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1y_status.html Marshall also diligently set himself the goal of getting everything in this list checked off in time for the Chicago meeting. He completed the lion's share of this list. I helped as much as I was able. Modulo issues with dynarray (i.e. stack allocation and constructors taking allocators), libc++ has implemented the C++1y spec as it stands today in N3690. Howard _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
