On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Author: hhinnant > > Date: Sat Sep 21 14:25:37 2013 > > New Revision: 191142 > > > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191142&view=rev > > Log: > > Apply LWG 2048. It is amazing to me that this actually works, but the > existing tests confirm that it does. c++1y status page now showing libc++ > is complete for c++1y modulo dynarray issues. > > > > This is fantastic! > > > > I'd love to see a blog post or something about having C++1y (library) > implemented during the CD period, and the benefits this provides to the > committee and standardization process. =D > > I've attempted to send such a post to [email protected]. It's been > nearly an hour since I tried and I've yet to see it show up. > > I don't keep a regular blog. Perhaps someone here knows how to get the > following posted on http://isocpp.org? > I do, but I think the right way to do it is as an LLVM blog post, that we can link to from isocpp.org. =] Chris or Tanya should be able to set you up with access to llvm.org's blog. If you draft something, and they aren't around I can also post it for you. > Marshall Clow set up a detailed checklist for bringing libc++ up to spec > with respect to C++1y ahead of the Chicago meeting: > > http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1y_status.html > > Marshall also diligently set himself the goal of getting everything in > this list checked off in time for the Chicago meeting. He completed the > lion's share of this list. I helped as much as I was able. > > Modulo issues with dynarray (i.e. stack allocation and constructors taking > allocators), libc++ has implemented the C++1y spec as it stands today in > N3690. > > Howard > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
