What's wrong with my approach of marking the specialization as a specialization instead? It does not trigger any assertion violations and all seems to work well?
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:953 @@ +952,3 @@ + // 'FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern()' + NewCallOperatorTemplate->setMemberSpecialization(); + } ---------------- But this seems to work and return the correct getTemplateInstantiationPattern - that allows addInstantiatedParameters to work as expected? What's wrong with this approach? http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
