jroelofs added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11963#227441, @EricWF wrote:
> @jroelofs What do you think of an approach like this? Having two copies of the __config_site file makes me uncomfortable, but I could put up with that given that they're effectively the same for 99% of people who will want to build this library. That being said, @mclow.lists raised a few concerns with the overall strategy... I don't want to keep pushing on this patch if his plan is to pocket-veto it. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11963 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
