> On Sep 8, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandl...@gmail.com> wrote: > None of my performance concerns were relevant to this change FWIW. > > I think the reason that this got "fixed" was because people had a tendancy to > *rely* on the name downstream when we made it always present. =/ Personally, > I like having *no* names in a no-asserts build because it ensures that > absolutely no one is relying on them -- we have debug information for that. > > I wonder if the right way to help the debugging scenario (which is very real > and painful) is to expose a flag for this, or to expose a way to take an IR > file with debug info and synthesize nice names for as much as we can using > the debug info?
It makes sense to me to have a codegen option to preserve some minimal set of descriptive names John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
