xazax.hun added a comment. Hi!
Thank you for the patch! What happens if you factor the "index + 1" expression out into a separate variable? E.g.: unsigned temp = index + 1; and use temp in the condition? My impression is that, the ranges does not model the overflow behavior correctly (which is well defined for unsigned values). I wondering why do you think that, the right way to solve this is to modify assumeSymNE and assumeSymEQ? Wouldn't it be better to actually handle the ranges properly on assignments and other operations (such as +), so assumeSymNE and assumeSymEQ can remain unmodified? http://reviews.llvm.org/D12901 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
