ABataev added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13336#257628, @rnk wrote:

> I think fundamentally we are doing too much declspec property lowering in 
> Sema. We might want to back up and figure out how to do it in IRGen. Right 
> now we have bugs like this, which are probably more important than new 
> functionality:
>  https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24132


Currently declspec property is represented as a member function call and does 
not keep info about property itself. Array subscripts exprs add arguments to 
this member function call and it must be built in Sema, so we could use an 
existing codegen for CallExprs.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D13336



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to