phillip.power added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305#268795, @xazax.hun wrote:
> > How close is "the near future"? I would like to start using the hashing > > feature in the next couple of weeks. If your checker identification > > improvements are a long time out, I would like you to submit the current > > hash as non-experimental. > > > As soon as I get some feedback for this mail: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045368.html . I think > Anna and her team is busy right now due to the LLVM Meeting. IMO the idea makes good sense and I can benefit from it when moving checkers from experimental packages to other packages. > If I do not get a response, I will commit this patch as is, and address those > questions in a separate commit. Thanks. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
